Category Archives: Newsletters

February 15th Newsletter

Who will Control Charter Schools –
Local School Board, State Board or Feds?

What did they know; when did they know it?

Georgia was the third state in the nation to enact charter schools legislation. S.B. 74 of 1993
defined a “charter” as a binding performance contract between the charter school, its local
board of education and the State Board of Education. A charter substitutes for state education
laws as well as state and local rules, policies, regulations and standards as governance for the
charter school. S.B. 74 authorized existing public schools to apply for three-year charters, if
approved by two-thirds of the school faculty and instructional staff, the parents of students
enrolled in the school, the local board of education and the State Board of Education.

  • To read the rest of this newsletter in PDF format, please click here.

January 2012 Newsletter

Protect the U.S. Constitution:
Oppose H.B. 667, H.R. 1137, S.R. 673

H.B. 667 Would By-Pass Electoral College; Elect President by National Popular Vote was introduced by Representative Benfield January 9, 2012 to by-pass the Electoral College, which is, ironically, the only function of national government performed outside of D.C. If 34 states pass identical bills, presidential candidates would campaign in densely populated areas only and ignore other locations. Georgia’s 15 members of the Electoral College (2 U.S. senators, 13 U.S. representatives) will become 16 when an additional representative is elected in November.

ACTION – Oppose. Contact the House Governmental Affairs Committee Representatives Hamilton, Ch., 404 656-5132; Purcell, 656-5139; Hatfield, 656-0109; Brockway, 656-0188; Brooks, 656-6372; Floyd, 656-0250; Kidd, 656-0202; Meadows, 656-5141; Morgan, 656-0109; Mosby, 656-0287; Oliver, 656-0265; O’Neal, 656-5052; Powell, J., 656-7856; Powell, A., 656-0202; and Williamson, 656-7859.

Two Con Con Bills introduced in Georgia General Assembly

H.R. 1137 Application to Congress for a Constitutional Convention1 introduced by Representative Welch January 23, 2012 joins other states in asking Congress to convene a Con Con for the purpose of passing an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to require a balanced federal budget. It covers the same subject as applications from Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Texas. If two-thirds of the states apply on the same subject, a con-con would be called by or before January 1, 2020.

ACTION – Oppose. These 58 co-signed H.R.1137. Ask your representative and others to remove their names. Representatives Welch, 404 656-0109; England, 463-2245; Meadows, 656-5141; Lindsey, 656-5024; Josh Clark, 656- 0325; Atwood, 656-0152; Yates, 656-5126; Teasley, 656-0177; Williamson, 656-7859; Dudgeon, 656-0298; Hightower, 656-0152; Jasperse, 656-0188; Coomer, 656-0109; Peake, 656-5025; Shaw, 656-0213; Dutton, 656-0188; Dickey, 656- 0287; Benton, 656-0213; Willard, 656-5125; Brockway, 656-0188; Rogers, 656-0325; Riley, 656-0188; Byrd, 656-0298; Davis, 656-7857; Bryant, 656-0298; Manning, 656-7857; McBrayer, 656-0126; Purcell, 656-5139; Parrish, 463-2247; McKillip, 656-0177; Casas, 656-0254; Dickson, 463-2247; Powell, A., 656-0202; Cooke, 656-0325; Black, 656-0287; Setzler, 656-0177; McCall, 656-5115; Braddock, 656-0177; Rogers 656-5146; Dunahoo, 656-0126; Hembree, 656-6801; Lynn Smith, 656-7149; Battles, 656-0152; Jerguson, 656-0188; Knight, 656-7855; Lane, 656-5087; Harden, 656-0188; Maddox, 656-3947; Wilkerson, 463-8143; Ron Stephens, 656-5115; C. Williams, 656-0254; Weldon, 656-0152; Dollar, 656-0254; Pak, 656-0254; Rynders, 463-2247; Parsons, 656-9198; R. Smith, 656-6831; Collins, 656-7737; and Sheldon, 656-5025.

  • To read the rest of this newsletter in PDF format, please click here.

December 2011 Newsletter

SHIP: Mandatory Obamacare for College Students

Until now, University System of Georgia (USG) students paid a fee to use the health clinic, but the federal government is implementing a mandatory Student Health Insurance Program (SHIP) for applicants without USG-approved policies. The new requirements of USG are as follows:

“Students (both undergraduate and graduate) who fail to submit creditable health insurance information will automatically be enrolled in and billed for the system-wide student health insurance plan. All 35 institutions of the USG are required to use Pearce & Pearce, Inc. as the provider for students who must purchase health insurance.”

HHS regulations govern SHIP. On February 9, 2011, the federal Department of Health and Human Services proposed the SHIP regulation under authority of two federal laws passed in 2010 – the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act. Public comment on SHIP was allowed until April 12, 2011.

On December 14, 2011, HHS reported the number of adults 19 through 25 years of age covered by private health insurance increased 2.5 million since September 2010, a result of Obamacare. With offspring remaining on their parents’ policies until age 26, that number will multiply.

SHOP: Obama-Compliant Health Insurance for Businesses

H.B. 476 is Georgia’s Obamacare-compliant legislation. If passed, it would put the state into the insurance business, big time! Government would be expanded with (a) a Georgia Health Exchange Authority and its nine-member governor-appointed board. (b) A Georgia Health Exchange Trust Fund would be a depository for federal grants, private contributions and other funds. (c) A governor-appointed Exchange Advisory Committee and (d) a Small Business Health Options Program (SHOP) would be created for small group plans. In 2011, H.B. 476 passed a House subcommittee before opposition caused the governor to pull it from the process.

But, S.B. 17 did pass in 2011, authorizing a Special Advisory Commission on Mandated Health Insurance and the governor signed it May 11, 2011. Recommendations by that commission will pave the way for H.B. 476 to be resurrected in the upcoming 2012 session.

Reasons Legislators Should Not Rush to Implement Government Controlled Insurance
(a) Soon, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether we can be forced to buy health insurance.
(b) If the Supreme Court rules Obamacare unconstitutional, the federal mandate will disappear.
(c) If the Court upholds Obamacare, states have until 2013 (a full year) to present a solid plan.
(d) If H.B. 476 passes, we could face state-mandated health insurance, if Obamacare is voided.
(e) Obamacare does not take effect until 2014, even if the U.S. Supreme Court upholds it.
(f) H.B. 476 is premature. It would put the state in the insurance business before it’s necessary.

  • To read the rest of this newsletter in PDF format, please click here.

November 2011 Newsletter

Christmas Gift to Shoppers: “Naughty & Nice” List

Retailers’ Choice: Honor Christmas or Censor Christmas

Liberty Counsel, affiliated with Liberty University School of Law, annually publishes a “Naughty and Nice” list of over 50 national retailers who censor or recognize Christmas. The information is gathered by consumers and is updated as new data is received. Liberty’s goal for the list is “to give the gift of Christmas back to those retailers who support it.”

Liberty Counsel Founder and Chairman Mathew D. Staver said, “Christmas isn’t a dirty word. No other federal holiday is blacklisted to the extent that Christmas is by some retailers.” Since the list began in 1995, many retailers have reversed course about Christmas. A good example:

Walgreens, November 22, 2011. If you had read the November 22nd Liberty Counsel press release entitled, “CVS and Walgreens Switched Sides on the “Naughty & Nice List,” you might have decided to boycott Walgreens during Christmas. Here‟s the story. For the first time since 2007, CVS Pharmacy has embraced Christmas with a “Christmas Central” portion of its web site. In contrast, Walgreens – on the “Nice” side last year – moved to the “Naughty” side this year, for not recognizing Christmas Day or Christmas Season as Christmas. Until …

Walgreens, November 23, 2011. The day after its previous press release, Liberty Counsel published a follow-up story entitled, “Walgreens Retracts Its Description of Christmas Decorations as “Holiday” Ones.” Then, explained the Walgreens turn-around:

“Just one day after coming under a firestorm for selling “holiday” gifts and providing “holiday” shipping for gifts to arrive by December 25th, Walgreens has worked to regain their “nice” status. …[A] spokesperson for Walgreens states, “During the month of December, there will be greater use of “Christmas” in our store and online. We should use the word “Christmas” to describe … Christmas decorations and gifts … there will be plenty of messages in our store and online that say “Merry Christmas.”"

But there’s more. Liberty Counsel received a report that Christmas music was being played in Indiana Walgreens stores in response to a directive from headquarters. Mr. Staver commented: “I am pleased with Walgreens for joining the growing number of stores that recognize Christmas. We will be monitoring stores and updating our “Naughty and Nice List” to help consumers support stores that support Christmas.”

  • To read the rest of this newsletter in PDF format, please click here.

October 2011 Newsletter

Humanism: Its Radical Effect on Faith and Government

“Humanism is the denial of God, and the total affirmation of man. …
Humanism is really nothing else but Marxism.” — Karl Marx

“It is a mistake to regard the assault on life and the family as an isolated phenomenon. Rather, that assault arises from the imperatives of an anti-God religion. This religion is Secular Humanism, which shares a common materialism with Marxism. According to this secular religion, one cannot affirm that man is immortal or that he has any significance greater than a chimpanzee. Secular Humanism is now the official religion of this nation. One of its principal objectives is the re-education of the American people so that they will never know or will forget the nature and the Author of Life.”
– Charles E. Rice, Professor of Law, Notre Dame Law School, Statement in 1977

In 1961 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that humanism is a religion (Torcaso v. Watkins). Then, in 1978 the Georgia Court of Appeals ruled that humanism is a religion (Spillers v. State). To answer a 1982 inquiry, Georgia Attorney General Michael Bowers issued Opinion No. U82-16, that says: “A humanist counselor of the American Humanist Association may lawfully perform a marriage ceremony in the State of Georgia and execute the return of the marriage license.”

During years of intensive research, Claire Chambers uncovered an underground movement of over-lapping membership. The details published in 1977 in his 506-page The SIECUS Circle: A Humanist Revolution revealed that a massive covert humanist network of organizations and individuals was dedicated to transforming America into a secular, collectivist state. “Secular,” i.e. unspiritual and “collectivist state,” i.e. a socialist government, rightly described their goal to displace God and establish socialism in the U.S. That double threat required a double defense – protect religious freedom and capitalism – against a well-oiled subversive strategy of elitists.

But, by the time humanists were exposed, they had successfully restricted Christianity in public education. In 1962 the Supreme Court ruled prayer in public schools unconstitutional and in 1963 Bible reading in public schools got the same treatment. After careful consideration of the unconstitutional silencing of Christianity, the SIECUS Circle publisher concluded:

“A Madalyn Murray O’Hair would have been powerless to remove prayer and Bible reading from the government schools if the Supreme Court of the United States had not drunk deeply at the humanist fountain. A creche would still be a part of the national and official observance of Christmas if the federal judiciary had not believed the humanist perversion of history which holds that America was founded not as a Christian state but as a secular state.”

However, the humanist aggression against God and the U.S. government had precluded, by many years, the success of self-proclaimed humanist O’Hair. As early as 1930, a publication entitled Humanism, A New Religion by Charles Francis Potter, made this stunning statement:

“Education is thus a most powerful ally of Humanism, and every American public school is a school of Humanism. What can the theistic Sunday Schools, meeting for an hour once a week, and teaching only a fraction of the children, do to stem the tide of a five-day program of humanistic teaching?”

  • To read the rest of this newsletter in PDF format, please click here.

September 2011 Newsletter

NEA and the New World Order

200 years after the declaration of Independence was adopted, NEA made an even more stunning declaration – their endorsement of Dr. Henry Commager’s Declaration of INTERdependence. That announcement was publicly made in 1976 during NEA’s bicentennial program entitled, “A Declaration of Interdependence: Education for a Global Community.”

The World Affairs Council of Philadelphia had commissioned American historian Henry Steele Commager to write the Declaration of INTERdependence, partially, funded by the Rockefeller Foundation. The Declaration states, “Two centuries ago our forefathers brought forth a new nation; now we must join with others to bring forth a new world order.” NEA’s endorsement indicates a preference for a new world order that would absorb all nations, including the U.S.A.

NEA affirmed that position when the 7,321 delegates of this year’s NEA conference endorsed President Obama for re-election and the NEA-PAC announced it would spend up to $60 million to give him another term. Off the subject a bit: The NEA union gave its “Friend of Education” award to the 14 Wisconsin Democrat state senators that left Wisconsin for three weeks to block a bill to limit the bargaining rights of state employee unions, including public school teachers.

A Sampling of NEA Resolutions Passed in 2011
Resolution B-24. Supports financial aid, in-state tuition, and U.S. citizenship for illegal aliens.
Resolution I-2. Urges U.S. participation/deliberations before the International Court of Justice.
Resolution I-3. NEA “believes” the U.S. should ratify the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and recognize and support its authority and jurisdiction.

President George Herbert Walker Bush announced his expectation for a “new world order” to arise soon after September 11, 1990, when he said to Congress: “our fifth objective – a new world order – can emerge” after the Persian Gulf war. It didn’t happen openly then, but today, we’re creeping toward a full-fledged new world order, determined to absorb the United States.

  • To read the rest of this newsletter in PDF format, please click here.

August 2011 Newsletter

Executive Order, August 18, 2011
White House Establishes LGBT Affirmative Action
for the Federal Workforce

EO Section 2 allows 90 days to implement a “Government-Wide Diversity and Inclusion Initiative and Strategic Plan.” Implementing the plan is the responsibility of the Director of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and the Deputy Director for the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Both Offices will coordinate with the President’s Management Council (PMC) and the Chairman of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).

EO Section 3, entitled “Responsibilities of Executive Departments and Agencies” sets a 120-day deadline for the issuance of the government-wide affirmative action plan to recruit, hire, train, develop, advance, promote, and retain a workforce that is diverse, i.e. LGBT personnel.

EO Section 4 continues the authority of government agencies and departments to establish independent Diversity and Inclusion Offices.

  • To read the rest of this newsletter in PDF format, please click here.

July 2011 Newsletter

The Great 2014 Turn-Off: U.S. Light Bulbs

“Feds can’t make up minds on mercury bulbs, ban outdoor lights while mandating use indoors. In what critics call a classic case of the government working at cross purposes, Washington is forcing residents across the country to install mercury lighting inside their homes while phasing out mercury lighting outside homes to protect the environment. In 2005, Congress passed a law banning mercury vapor streetlights – two years before it banned incandescent light bulbs in favor of mercury vapor compact florescent bulbs.” – WorldNetDaily, July 22, 2011

The 2007 Energy Act banned the manufacture and sale of Edison light bulbs by 2014. Also in 2007, General Electric announced plans to produce by 2010 an energy-efficient new generation incandescent bulb. Since that never materialized, 100-watt bulbs are scheduled for phase-out in 2012. Unless the 2007 law is repealed or a “new generation” of incandescent bulbs is invented to satisfy environmentalists, manufacture and sale of Edison 75-, 60- and 40-watt bulbs will end by 2014. Their replacement is a made-in-China dimmer fluorescent bulb containing mercury. Breakage is so dangerous HAZMAT has strict clean-up guidelines to reduce health hazards.

H.R. 2417, introduced in Congress July 6th to repeal the 2007 federal incandescent bulb ban, was put on a fast track, had no hearing and was rushed onto the House floor. That violation of procedure triggered a super majority vote rule, resulting in a 233 – 193 party-line defeat July 12th, when ten Republicans voted AGAINST it and only five Democrats voted FOR it.

H.R. 2417 co-sponsor Senator Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) explained why the ban should be repealed: “It’s just another government intrusion in our lives. I think people are just increasingly aggravated that the government is telling us what kind of toilets we have, what kind of light bulbs we have, what kind of health insurance, so I think it is just coming to a boil outside.”

Georgia’s S.B. 61, introduced by Senator Barry Loudermilk, cited the U.S. Constitution Tenth Amendment, Ninth Amendment and Article I, Section 8 as authorization for states to counteract federal law. His bill would authorize the manufacture and sale of incandescent light bulbs within Georgia, but they could not be exported to another state. S.B. 61 passed the Georgia Senate on March 7th and is in the House Science and Technology Committee for action in 2012.

Situation Summary. (a) A new incandescent bulb bill may be introduced any time in Congress. (b) Georgia’s S.B. 61 remains alive for the 2012 session. (c) If a good bulb bill fails to pass by 2014, (d) China’s economy will be enriched, (e) as factories close and jobs vanish in the U.S.

ACTION – Support American-made light bulb legislation. Contact state and federal officials as follows:
1. Federal H.R. 2417. Congressmen by districts: 1. Kingston, 202 225-5831, fax 912 352-0105; 2. Bishop, 202 225-3631, fax 229 436-2099; 3. Westmoreland, 202 225-5901, fax 770 683-2042; 4. Johnson, 202 225-1605, fax 770 987-8721; 5. Lewis, 202 225-3801, fax 404 331-0947; 6. Price, 202 225-4501, fax 770 565-7570; 7. Woodall, 202 225-4272, fax 770 232-2909; 8. Marshall, 202 225-6531, 478 464-0277; 9. Graves, 202 225-5211, fax 770 335-2765; 10. Broun, 202 225-4101, fax 706 868-8756; 11. Gingrey, 202 225-2931, fax 678 721-7995; 12. Barrow, 202 225-2823, fax 706 722-4496; 13. Scott, 202 225-2939, fax 770 210-5673 (Georgia fax numbers)
2. Georgia Legislation S.B. 61. Contact Science and Technology Committee Representatives Amerson, Ch., 404 657-8443; Battles, V-Ch., 404 656-0152; Byrd, Sec., 404 656-0298; Dudgeon, 404 656-0298; Kidd, 404 656-0202; C. Martin, 404 656-5064; Reece-Massey, 404 656-7859; Oliver, 404 656-0265; S. Scott, 404 656-0314; and Watson, 404 656-0109.

  • To read the rest of this newsletter in PDF format, please click here.

June 2011 Newsletter

Smart Meters: No Clear Authority for Installation in Georgia

Health hazards to consumers far outweigh conveniences to power companies.
In January, the day after I gave legislators copies of the Federal Energy Act of 2005 and documentation of the dangers posed by smart meters, the director of the smart meter program in Georgia called me at home and insinuated that the PSC authorized smart meter installation. When I asked for a copy of the authorization and minutes of that PSC meeting, he quietly admitted, “Well, technically, we don’t need their permission.”

When I first reported the installation of smart meters in Georgia in the February 4, 2011 issue of Georgia Insight, the project had been under way since 2008, under the radar. In places smart meters were installed, most occupants had no idea their meter had been replaced or that the new one is a two-way radio frequency communication device. They didn’t/don’t know it emits radiation 24 hours a day around the clock, deposits electrical “noise” and high-frequency spikes throughout the wiring and is remotely read every 15 minutes (96 times each 24 hours).

Although the 2005 Federal Energy Act requires utilities to “offer” smart meters to consumers “requesting time-based billing,” we have yet to find a consumer who requested time-based billing or was offered a smart meter or was informed of its hazardous radio frequency radiation.

After running errands April 20, 2010, we accidentally learned that our analog meter was gone. The clue: our digital clocks were blinking. Georgia Power had shut off the electricity to install a smart meter on the outside wall, 14 feet from the location of our bed on the same wall inside.

In September 2010, my husband Robert was diagnosed with skin cancer for the first time in his life. He had surgery. At his first three-months’ check-up, the plastic surgeon found two more spots of skin cancer, which were, subsequently removed, as well. His six-months’ check-up will be in September. Also, both of us experience continual ringing in our ears.

Robert’s monitoring Public Service Commission meetings has been very revealing. Providers of electricity in Georgia had/have no legislative or PSC authority to install smart meters. They had/have no authority to require consumers to have/accept/tolerate smart meters. Georgia Power and EMC could’ve/should’ve upgraded with meters that do not emit radio frequency radiation. The smart meter is still on our home, although we repeatedly ask for its removal.

I know of no location where Georgia Power has complied with requests to remove smart meters. They finished their installations in North Georgia and, with in-your-face determination, are proceeding with the second phase – installing smart meters from Macon to the Florida line.

Three Cheers for Sawnee EMC!

  • Sawnee EMC customers have had good response about the smart meter situation.
  • Sawnee honored a consumer request to remove the smart meter and reinstall the analog.
  • Sawnee honored a request NOT to install a smart meter and left the analog meter in place.

ACTION – (a) Explain to your utility (Georgia Power or an EMC) that the smart meter on your property is a serious health hazard that becomes more hazardous with each one installed in the “mesh Network.” (b) If a smart meter is on your property, ask for its removal. (c) If your meter is an analog, attach a sign, “Do NOT remove my meter.”

  • To read the rest of this newsletter in PDF format, please click here.

May 2011 Newsletter

Looming: Civil Rights Status
for Sexual Orientation & Gender Identity

H.B. 630 gives civil rights protection to pedophiles, peeping toms, cross-dressers, flashers and those practicing bestiality or necrophilia (sex with corpse). The American Psychiatric Association (APA) lists these and other acts as deviant and abnormal sexual behaviors. They are chargeable offenses under Georgia law, as well.

H.B. 630 Requires Workforce “Balance”
Based on Sexual Orientation & Gender ID

The American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders categorizes many sexual orientations and variant gender identities as deviant and abnormal behaviors. Although homosexuality was dropped from the list in 1974, after activists stormed an APA conference, it will be among almost two dozen sexual orientations and other gender identities that would be elevated to civil rights status in Georgia, if H.B. 630 passes.

Since H.B. 630 proposes a drastic shift in public policy, results of its passage must be carefully examined. Discussions of H.B. 630 must include the following highly relevant facts: (a) Sex and gender are not synonymous terms. (b) Sexual orientation and gender identity fail the three-pronged test used to determine civil rights status. (c) Sexual identity is a biological fact evidenced by the perineum. (d) Gender identity is self-determined and self-assumed.

Representative Karla Drenner introduced H.B. 630 with only three days left in the session, so it would be carried into the 2012 session. Her strategy was to recruit as many co-sponsors as she could before introducing it March 31st with 70 co-sponsors – 58 Democrats and 12 Republicans, who must be unaware of the transformation such a law would enforce on society.

H.B. 630 would classify “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” as civil rights, without defining the terms. So, two broad undefined behavioral groups would get civil rights status and special protection. Affirmative action would give them preference in public employment and offenders could not be charged for actions they could blame on sexual orientation or gender ID.

H.B. 630 would require the state, its counties and municipalities to give employees claiming variant sexual orientations and/or gender identities, all the benefits and special provisions of federal laws concerning civil rights, equal employment, age discrimination, and rehabilitation

Ultimately or immediately, the state, municipalities and counties would be required to hire, fire, train, compensate and promote using affirmative action to achieve workforce “balance” based on variant sexual behaviors and gender identities. Staff in public daycare and public schools – teachers, counselors, substitutes, aides, principals, superintendents, custodians, security guards, cafeteria work – would be “balanced,” according to sexual orientation and gender identity.

ACTION – Ask the following 12 Republican to remove their names as co-sponsors of H.B. 630. Below are their names, towns, capitol phones, local phones and fax numbers if available. 58 Democrats may be contacted later.

Ellis Black, Valdosta, 404 656-0287, 229 251-0303; Sharon Cooper, Marietta, 404 656-5069, 770 951-2841, fax 770 956-9693; Harry Geisinger, Roswell, 404 656-0254, 678 777-6010, fax 770 594-1510; Gerald Greene, Cuthbert, 404 656-0202, 229 732-2750; Ben Harbin, Evans, 404 656-3949, 706 869-1953, fax 706 863-8959; Mike Jacobs, Atlanta, 404 656-0152, 404 441-0583; Alan Powell, Hartwell, 404 656-0202, 706 376-4422; Kip Smith, Columbus, 404 656-0213, 706 315-8532; Richard Smith, Columbus, 404 656-6831, 706 442-3480; Ron Stephens, Savannah, 404 656-5099, 912 966-5665, fax 912 964-9699; Wendell Willard, Sandy Springs, 404 656-5125, 770 481-7100, fax 770 481-7111;
Roger Williams, Dalton, 404 656-3904; 706 278-0390

  • To read the rest of this newsletter in PDF format, please click here.